Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ji Sung Nam vs Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nam vs Mcdaniels analysis and find out who is favored!
Ji Sung Nam vs Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nam 1 - 0 Mcdaniels
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nam has won 45.71% of points on their second serve, while Mcdaniels has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nam, in recent form, has won 49.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mcdaniels has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nam has saved 52.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mcdaniels has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nam has won 48.28% of matches played (W/L 14/ 15), with Mcdaniels winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 232/ 169), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Mcdaniels has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 50/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 13/ 13), where as Mcdaniels has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nam winning 1 times and Mcdaniels being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nam winning 2 and Mcdaniels winning 0. The last match between Nam and Mcdaniels was at the Korea F3 (Daegu), 19-06-2018, First, Hard with Ji Sung Nam getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nam and Mcdaniels have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nam winning 0 times and Mcdaniels 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nam winning 0, and Mcdaniels 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nam has played against opponents with an average rank of 309.52 while Mcdaniels has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nam has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mcdaniels has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nam has converted 40.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mcdaniels has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
663
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
32
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
56% (279-215)
Career Total W/L
60% (71-48)
45% (5-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,445
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ji Sung Nam vs Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nam VS Mcdaniels
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Ji Sung Nam | Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:53:0 | 0:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (21/30) | 52% (24/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (18/21) | 46% (11/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (6/9) | 27% (6/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (29/46) | 20% (6/30) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ji Sung Nam | Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (11/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (113/130) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 184.18 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (446/761) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (305/446) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (144/315) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (31/77) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (310/795) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (5/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ji Sung Nam
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Yunseong Chung
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Kaito Uesugi
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Shintaro Imai
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
122)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Olivares
Player
Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-4 13-11 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Cozbinov
Player
Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
50
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 1-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 0-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Young Seok Kim
Player
Mitchell Thomas Mcdaniels
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
62 of
86)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Nam Vs Mcdaniels Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nam are available here and Mcdaniels photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
